MINUTES
LITCHFIELD SCHOOL BUILDING COMMITTEE
LITCHFIELD INTERMEDIATE LIBRARY
APRIL 15, 2004
A meeting of the Litchfield School
Building Committee was held on Thursday, April 15, 2004, at 7:00 p.m. in the
Litchfield Intermediate School Music Room.
Present were: Jack Healy; Chairman,
William Buckley; Robert Blazek, Lynn Chapman; John Mullen; Stacey Kavle.
Also Present: BOE Member Wayne
Shuhi; Richard Munday, Tim Callahan of Herbert S. Newman and Partners; Bruce
Walpole of O&G Industries; Public and the Press.
Meeting was called to order at 7:10
PM by J. Healy.
Motion made by B. Buckley to table
the approval of the minutes, seconded by R. Blazek.
Motion Carried. All votes were in the affirmative. There were no abstentions.
Public Participation - None
Discussion of Schedule
J. Zullo and M. Bramley would like
to see an acceleration of the schedule to reduce cost. R. Blazek - Aren=t we already ahead of schedule
because Newman already worked schematics on LIS? R. Munday - The building was not looked at in
that capacity, it is now a renovation with a small addition. This building will be put on a normal design
schedule it would be too hard to accelerate that schedule when there is work to
be done with this committee. B. Buckley
- We already have 45 month contracts.
Let=s stick to contracts, don=t rush it. The schedule has already been developed based
on State. R. Blazek - I agree with Bill,
why does Jeff want to accelerate it? J.
Healy - Mac is concerned about committing money without formal approval from
State. B. Buckley - We don=t want to micro manage the
architect. Let them do what they were
hired to do, give them room to develop.
Updates Architect and Construction
Manager
R. Munday talked about phases we
will be going through:
1. Schematic design - turning
conceptual into much more detail, drawings show the area of each room, function
of room, outline specification.
2. Design development - enter a
higher degree of accuracy, examine elements of the building. R. Munday does not want to see multiple
phasing in the bid contractor process.
B. Walpole thought it was better to take advantage of combo-bidding
(both LHS & LIS). T. Callahan will
call Superintendent for a copy of the final approved Ed Specs. R. Munday needs a process in place to work
with BOE for consulting on work. W.
Shuhi asked him to contact any member of the BOE regarding issues. Building Committee meeting dated will be
biweekly (every other week) during school design. J. Healy thought a subcommittee should meet
with Architect during school design phase.
B. Buckley likes the 1ST and 3RD Thursday. T. Callahan believes that a subcommittee was
very helpful last project. B. Buckley
also liked that idea by thinks subcommittee should not have authority to make
design decisions. Motion was made by R.
Blazek to put together a work group - tabled until next meeting. Interested members should call Jack Healy and
volunteer instead of appoint. R. Munday decided that architect the key contact
should be Jack. Information will be
posted to the school=s website. J. Healy stated that all decisions will come
form committee and no outside committee is allowed to direct O & G or
Architect in the design decisions. The
Ed Specs fundamentally designs the building.
BOE can not authorize work, it needs to come to committee. BOE should review the plans as the Architect
creates designs. The Architect will give
presentations to BOE and other school officials so they understand the
process. W. Shuhi - We can extend an
invitation to school employees to informational meeting during one of our
regularly scheduled meetings. It was
decided to table discussion on this to next meeting and talk to Superintendent
and Principal Breslin.
Motion was made by B. Buckley to
wave rules so that BOE Member Wayne Shuhi can talk openly at meeting, seconded
by R. Blazek.
Motion Carried. All votes were in the affirmative. There were no abstentions.
W. Shuhi - Open meetings so that BOE
can participate. B. Buckley - We should
waive Robert=s Rules at meetings for BOE to speak
openly because Peg Perusse, John Tindall-Gibson and School Principals have a
lot to say about this project.
Motion was made by B. Buckley to
authorize Chairman to work with Peg Perusse for qualifications for land use
attorneys, seconded by S. Kavle.
Discussion
B. Buckley - The first meeting in
May (6Th) qualifications to them to pick one and get them on
board. Attorneys to draft a letter to
various boards; Planning & Zoning, Inland Wetlands. J. Healy suggested inviting Fire Marshall and
Building Inspector to come to meetings and it was decided to as Leo Paul to
invite both officials to get involved in the process and let them know where we
are. T. Callahan - Basic Service
Consultants, we will use the same ones from the last time, he feels they are
well qualified, included in Basic Service Contract.
Motion Carried. All votes were in the affirmative. There were no abstentions.
Motion was made by B. Buckley to
approve five sub-consultants before that are brought on board, seconded by R.
Blazek.
Discussion
R. Blazek questioned whether these
fees are included in the Basic Service Contract and was yes. T. Callahan stated that the traffic
consultant was first priority. B.
Buckley asked if they could bring Committee proposals for traffic consultant.
Motion Carried. All votes were in the affirmative. There were no abstentions.
J. Healy asked Architect to alert
them of anything outside of Basic Services.
Motion to adjourn was made by R.
Blazek at 8:40 PM.
Motion Carried. All votes were in the affirmative. There were no abstentions.
Minutes taken by Lynn Chapman, Secretary
Respectfully Submitted,
Kelli L. Green