MINUTES

LITCHFIELD SCHOOL BUILDING COMMITTEE

 LITCHFIELD INTERMEDIATE MUSIC ROOM

JUNE 17, 2004

 

 

A meeting of the Litchfield School Building Committee was held on Thursday, June 17, 2004, at 7:00 p.m. in the Litchfield Intermediate Music Room.

 

Present were:, Jack Healy, Chairman; William Buckley; Robert Blazek; John Mullen; Mac Bramley; Lynn Chapman; Stacey Kavle; and Gary Waugh.

 

Also Present:; John Tindall-Gibson; Peg Perusse; Anne Stillman; BOE Members, Frank Simone  and  Wayne Shuhi; Tim Callahan , Richard Munday and Fernando Pastur of Herbert S. Newman and Partners; Bruce Walpole of O&G Industries; Ed Fabbri; Public and the Press.

 

Meeting was called to order at 7:05 PM by J. Healy

 

Approval of Minutes

 

Motion was made by R. Blazek to approve the Minutes of the meeting of April 15, 2004 as amended, seconded by B. Buckley.

Motion Carried.  All votes were in the affirmative.  There were no abstentions.

 

Motion made by B. Buckley to approve the minutes of the June 3, 2004 meeting as amended, seconded by B. Buckley. 

Motion Carried.  All votes were in the affirmative. There were no abstentions.

 

Public Participation –

J. Tindall-Gibson spoke about Air Quality at LIS.  Tests were done before the start of school in August 2003 and again in March 2004.  In Summary:

            Spore counts (dusted collected from carpet) - Mold growth had gone away since August, however, in Room 53, the spore counts is less than August but much highway than the rest of the building.

            Airborne Pollen Samples – August report was in the thousands, March report was in the hundreds.

            Moisture Emission Rate Test – In August found 3 lbs. per square in per 24 hours, a problem for mold growth.  March was the same as the previous test in room 53.  Recommended taking carpet out of room 53 and throw it away.  The carpet is only one year old.

We want to work with the Building Committee on what to do.   G. Waugh suggested putting tile in room 53.   J. Tindall Gibson - We talked about leaving concrete there for next year or we do have carpet left over and can put new carpet back in there.   B. Buckley suggested sampling again after the carpet is removed and after the new carpet is put in.  J. Mullen suggested remove carpeting and seal slab before you put new carpet back in the room.   J. Tindall-Gibson – We don’t know that the water emission to slab is creating the mold growth.   B. Buckley – The Air Quality has to be addressed by the Consultants.  It is not normal.  This building (LIS) has serious problems.  This should be one of the primary considerations.  There are repairs; we can put drains in around the building to control the moisture.  Give us an idea of what component is addressing air quality.   R. Munday – Our Forensics Consultant had this report and is going to be continuing the work we did on the last project with solution that relate to different portions of the building.  There is not one single solution.   B. Buckley – We should carry this as an Agenda item.  J. Healy – You need to look at the entire air system as part of that sampling. 

 

Playing Fields

E. Fabbri – SBC is looking for an answer on how many pairs of telephone wires need to come to this building.  We need to know where to locate conduits for water and electric.

Betsy Glassman spoke about her concerns about parking space for the fields and concerns about sedimentation and erosion.  J. Healy reminded her that the design and construction of the fields is the responsibility of the Playing Fields Group.

 

Communication

R. Blazek had the following communication from the Board of Selectman (“BOS”):

Bill Dranginis is pleased about the space for the Litchfield Booster Club Hall of Fame Wall.  Kevin Creed wants to know who specifically will be in charge of safety issues during construction and while school is in session.   Bruce Walpole of O & G stated that the Project Manager and the Superintendent will be in charge on a daily basis.  A Safety Officer will visit and site weekly for inspections.   There will be a sire logistics plan.  Policies and procedures are put in place and monitored by the Superintendent and there are weekly meetings with workers.   J. Mullen – Everyone is responsible for safety.  Weekly, the crew had to sit down for a safety meeting.  Anne Stillman – In other projects I have been involved in the workers are very identifiable.  B. Walpole – We use badges.  The crew is not allowed to use the cafeteria or school bathrooms.

R. Blazek also passed on that the Selectman were very uncomfortable with the traffic flow at LHS; mainly for safety issues and they are not in favor of putting the Administration in the new wing at LIS.

 

J. Healy – I received a call from Michael Murray.  The O & G contract is not yet signed.  Mr. Murray said that O & G is implicated in the Rowland Scandal.  There is legislation at the State level to require contract to sign affidavits after October 2004.    The advice form out Attorney is to not get involved and let the State handle it.

B. Buckley asked if each Building Committee member can have copies of the executed contracts. J. Healy – Will get theses copies before the next regular meeting.   Peg Perusse will be the holder of the original contracts.  B. Buckley – I would like copies of all subcontractor contracts also. 

 

J. Healy – We solicited for a land use attorney and received two responses; Peter Herbst and an Attorney from Watertown. 

Motion was made by M. Bramley to sign a contract with Peter Herbst as Land Use Attorney, seconded by R. Blazek.

 

Discussion   For $200.00 and hour and he is not to do work with Building Committee Approval.

 

Motion Carried.  All votes were in the affirmative.  There were not abstentions.

 

J. Healy – I am meeting with Leo Paul the Friday after the second Thursday meeting of the month.    G. Waugh asked if information was being posted on a regular basis, beyond the minutes, to the public.

 

Architect Update

R. Munday introduced Fernando Pastur who is joining the team as the Project Architect.  He will

be in charge of both schools and be responsible for all the design aspects, development

strategies and the envelope design of the new portions.

 

Litchfield High School -

 

Advancing in the Plan in trying to develop greater efficiency and looking to both improve the plan and save money.   We are tweaking the plans.  The Committee reviewed the plan changes including movement of the 7-8 grade science rooms, a discussion of bathrooms neat the gymnasium, art and music space.  We have a checklist of the Ed Specs so that we can see that we are not missing anything and that the Ed Specs are being followed.  The diagram shows it is possible to locate a future Auditorium on this site.  Bruce Walpole ran the numbers for Plan C-5M compared with ED-049R, Plan B-1 and Plan C-5.  There are also site issues.  No money was put into the site work.  The numbers are about the same.  Once again the concern is the rising cost of materials (steel).  There is an escalation factor of 7%.  If escalation had to go up, that means the square footage must go down.   M. Bramley – Is there any way to make a certain portion of the plans optional?  T. Callahan – It’s very difficult to do.  R. Blazek – What do you replace steel beams with?  B. Walpole – One consideration may be load bearing walls, but that comes with other issues.

A discussion followed between Bruce Walpole and Bill Buckley on the cost of square footage.  The CM is waiting to get bids on some other jobs before deciding to raise the escalation rate.

Litchfield Intermediate School

After the Selectman’s comments the BC discussed one again the placement of the Administrative Offices.   Anne Stillman – At this point we can not see who is at the front door, it would be the same in the old library space.  The front entrance will be only used during the day for bus drop off and pick up and be locked in between times.   The side entrance, where our office would be stationed is the entrance for the parent drop off and all other visitors to the school during the school day.  G. Waugh – Administrators need to be in a place closest to the action.  Concept A-2 is more accessible to all staff than putting the office in the old Library.   F. Simone – Just for safety reasons, concept A-2 is safer.  Anne Stillman – It is about between 8:30 and 3:00, being able to know who we are letting in the building and have quicker access to the office.  R. Munday – Buildings can have two front doors, If the new side door is developed in such a way, that you can understand the difference, it’s okay.  R. Blazek – Are we allowing for traffic to the playing fields.   J. Healy – The loop will be closed off between 8:30 AM and 3:00 PM.  LHS students will walk up the side walks to the fields.  M. Bramley – we are making two lobbies, one to accommodate public activities, and one to accommodate the students.  W. Shuhi- In thinking about segregating the children coming into the building, if the traffic can be controlled, the side entrance can quickly access all three floors and is the best plan.  B.  Buckley – We need to send the Architect back to the drawing board with regard to the parking.  A playing field representative has to be here to coordinate this effort.  J. Healy – We need to take the money that we have and use it for the schools.  We don’t have money in this budget for parking.  M. Bramley – The courtyard, if it was a simple grass area, would it be used?  Ann Stillman – We would utilize that space.  Right now it is too wet.

Initial Traffic Study 

T. Callahan – The issue is going to be at LHS and how we separate the drop off.

Consultants

     Food Service

     Information Technology

     Theater Design

     Traffic Engineer

 

R. Munday - The Theater Consultant will give us advice on the program to meet the needs of the various groups that use the Auditorium, meeting those needs within our budget.  We would like a consultant to work with us on that scope.  To spend money wisely we should have someone to give us some ideas of what we can do.   We are looking at the $62K as a placeholder but just committing to the $4,000.00.  M. Bramley – If this number is not earth-shaking I believe that the $4,000.00 would be well spent.  B. Buckley suggested taking to J. Tindall-Gibson, Anne Stillman and Maurice Steinberg and they can design a fix.  R. Munday – We are trying to extract as much value as we can.  I feel strongly that a Theater Consultant is a valuable asset.  The Auditorium is a community resource. 

Motion was made by G. Waugh to hire a Theater Consultant for the front end investigation, seconded by Lynn Chapman.

Discussion

L. Chapman – I think for $4,000.00 we should understand what we are doing.  G. Waugh – Wouldn’t the Consultant interview the LPA, Maurice and any other people using the space to figure out what has to be done to this space?  P. Perusse – We have a storage trailer at LHS which is full of props, we need space for this.  R. Munday – Our expectation of the Theater Designer is the programming effort, on the basis of knowledge of people who are using the Auditorium he will develop a conceptual design.

Motion Failed.  All votes were in the negative except G. Waugh, L. Chapman and M. Bramley who voted in the positive.  J. Healy broke the tie with a negative vote. 

B. Buckley – A narrative from a Theater Consultant would be good idea.   L. Chapman – Can we ask Music/Band/Drama Teachers what their needs are for the next meeting?

Finance Update

Pre-referendum budget= $50,000.00

Expenditures as follows:

 

Secretary:      $  1431.00

Legal                    600.00

Public Comm. 13,843.64

Postage                557.64

Architect          30,000.00

B of E reimb.      1,032.07

 

Total                47,464.35

 

Return

  To Town          2,535.65

 

Motion to adjourn was made by B. Buckley and seconded by L. Chapman 10:05 PM

Motion Carried.  All votes were in the affirmative.  There were no abstentions.

 

Respectfully Submitted,

 

 

Kelli L. Green, Recorded