|
LITCHFIELD BOARD OF
EDUCATION
REGULAR MEETING |
|
A regular meeting of the Litchfield Board of
Education was held on Board members present were: Mr. Shuhi, Chairperson; Mrs. Reardon; Messrs. Fairchild, Falcetti, Gorman, Katzin, Noone, Simone and Tourtellotte. Also present were: Dr. Vita; Mrs. Perusse; Mr. Zaremski; and members of the public.
MOTION made by Mr. Simone and seconded by Mr.
Noone: to move to Executive Session at MOTION carried. All votes were in the affirmative. There were no abstentions. Executive SessionPresent were: all the above Board members and Dr. Vita. Open session resumed at Board meeting resumed at
MOTION made by Mr. Simone and seconded by Mr.
Falcetti: to approve the minutes of the MOTION carried. All votes were in the affirmative. Mr. Katzin abstained. Public Comment and CorrespondenceMr. Waugh updated the Board on the School Building Committee including the following: report on the planning and zoning meeting held last Monday; noise in classroom issues; need for panels in the rooms; readings to be taken; lighting issues; possible reflective paint to be used; additional support columns; air conditioning status; library status; gym work; removing decayed areas; paneling status; gym entrance way; technology bid packages; legal issues pending; contingency around $600,000 to $700,000; little behind on the schedule; and possible walk through by the Board in the near future. Mrs. Harrison commented on the parking lot issue including: use of the money; safety concerns; energy conservation; restrict juniors; crossing guard for route 202; and possibly enact a Board policy for student driving. Mr. Murray commented on the following: congratulations to Mr. Katzin on his election to the Board; Board never votes along party lines; support public comment at meetings including special meetings; public conversation was positive event; responses don’t become available to members of the community; and possible increase in attendance at Board meetings if time were allotted for public comment with responses. Mrs. Penney commented that people would show up more if there were more opportunities for public comment and participation. Board members received the following correspondence:
New BusinessDr. Vita reported that the budget status for 2006-07 is within the budget allocation. Final numbers will be provided when all accounts are reconciled.
MOTION made by Mrs. Reardon and seconded by
Mr. Gorman: to approve the final plans and project
manual-Center School Annex Roof Replacement as dated Board members discussed the following: cost of roof $209,906; approved by Facilities Committee and reviewed by the Board in the past. MOTION carried. All votes were in the affirmative. Mr. Katzin abstained. MOTION made by Mr. Tourtellotte and seconded by Mrs. Reardon: to approve the payment of invoices and adjustments to line item expenditures as required. MOTION carried. All votes were in the affirmative. There were no abstentions. Dr. Vita reported on the negotiations process held with the administrators ending with a contract extension and adjustments. The salary increase for this year is 2% and for 2008/2009, 2009/2010, 2010/2011 the increase will be 2.95%. There were significant reduction in several areas and the attorney was involved in developing this agreement. Board members reviewed the contract page by page at a previous meeting.
MOTION made by Mr. Gorman and seconded by Mr.
Simone: to ratify the revised and extended Agreement
between the Litchfield Board of Education and the
Litchfield Administrators Association stipulating the
conditions of employment for school administrators from MOTION carried. All votes were in the affirmative. There were no abstentions. Dr. Vita noted that the transportation contract expires at the end of the school year and the extension of this agreement should be deferred to the Finance and Facilities Committee to investigate the benefits or lack there of.
Board members agreed to discuss this issue on the
25th at Board members discussed the procedure for public comment and/or participation at Board of Education meetings including the following: are a public meeting not a meeting of the public; regular meetings require public comment; forms are available for people to ask questions; can answer short, factual questions; possible put time aside to field questions and possible short answers; meetings are very didactic; possible second opportunity towards the end of the meeting for further public participation; possibly keep 3 minute limit; takes weeks before answers to some questions are made available; answers cannot be part of minutes; possible use of web site to publish answers to questions; minutes are historic documents and should record only Board actions; possible alternatives to disseminate information; need to always listen to the public; time concerns; need for special meeting to discuss big issues; contentious agenda items need public participation; use discretion and have some sense of when the public has something to say; need to give opportunity to speak; some responses need time to be answered; need for two way conversation with time limit; possible deterioration of decorum; integrity of Board meeting needs to be maintained; special meetings can’t vary from the agenda so need to be careful not to respond; not making policy but are making practice; possible general email address for questions and answers; and need to address issues when necessary as done in the past with special meetings to discuss those issues. Dr. Vita outlined the procedure for appropriate access to and utilization of the Board’s attorney. The attorney is the attorney for the Board and not the individual Board member. Typically contact should go through the superintendent unless the contact is regarding the superintendent and then the chairperson would do the contacting. Because of the cost of the attorney it would be best if some sort of order of procedure was followed. Board members discussed the following: need for more information to be shared; benefit from wisdom; sensitive issues; prefer not to email leaving a paper trail; need to inform the Board members when possible; and need to be updated on policy issues from the attorney. Old BusinessBoard members continued the discussion regarding the option of appointing a Board Hearing officer (panel of one) for student disciplinary hearings including: don’t have many expulsions; person who understands the state statutes; mandatory and discretionary expulsions; similar to a court case; saving costs and time; benefits to having 9 judges assessing; possible hearing panel; and need for a quorum. Board consensus was to continue conducting the hearings themselves. Superintendent’s ReportMr. Gorman left at Dr. Vita reported on the following:
Board members discussed the following: need for writing samples from guidance candidates; and try to get someone with experience. Committee ReportsNegotiations LiaisonDr. Vita noted that the AFSCME contract negotiations will be starting soon. Mr. Shuhi noted that there is a need to replace the BOE liaison to Litchfield Education Foundation and committee assignments.
MOTION made by Mr. Falcetti and seconded by
Mr. Simone: to move to Executive session at MOTION carried. All votes were in the affirmative. There were no abstentions. Executive SessionPresent were all the above Board members (except for F. Gorman) and Dr. Vita.
Open session resumed at No action was taken.
MOTION made by F. Simone and seconded by D.
Falcetti: to adjourn the meeting ata11: MOTION carried. All votes were in the affirmative. There were no abstentions. Respectfully submitted, Donald Falcetti, Secretary Joanne Bertrand, Recording Secretary
|